topleft
topright
Enter the Member Network Zone View the Top 10 Points Leaderboard View Members Who Are Currently Online View Latest Member Activity

Featured Members


Member Network Zone

Expert Blog Comments

Want To Buy a Toyota Prius?
If you want another Prius, get another Prius. Don't let media reports influence YOUR desire. It's ...
The Trouble with Big IT
The problem has never been the technology but people who implement the technologies. The idea around...
Want To Buy a Toyota Prius?
When you have highly complex, real-time software controlling hardware systems, it's virtually imposs...
Sun Veteran Joins Google, Hates Apple
Bray's comments clearly signal the beginning of a war between Google and Apple. You have to wonder w...
What Came First, The Requirements or The Data Model?
It's unfortunate that IT has become a slave to its history. We invented flowcharts to express what w...
When Good Outsourcing Goes Bad: A Case Study Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Thursday, 09 April 2009
Article Index
When Good Outsourcing Goes Bad: A Case Study
Problems Appear Early On
Continuing Problems
Avoid Outsourcing Pitfalls

 


 


 




Also See:
Free Podcast on Outscourcing, Exploring Rationale and Cost Savings
Outsourcing Webcast: Benefits and Potential Downsides of Outsourcing IT Functions


Executive Summary


Numerous financial models indicate the positive value of network outsourcing. However, many models fail to consider critical business requirements, changing business models, and the impact of unexpected outsourcing delays. Network outsourcing is a bit problematic because it is dynamic in nature and must continuously deliver high levels of elasticity, reliability, and resiliency. This case study, based on one company's experience, referred to as Company X, discusses the following points.


 


     


  • First, a brief description of Company X's network infrastructure.
  •  


  • Next, five major problem areas that impacted the outsourcing arrangement.
  •  


  • Finally, a look at the problem resolution actions taken by Company X.
  •  


 


Although network outsourcing can exhibit paper benefits, this case study reviews a mid-sized company's actual experience one year later.

Company X determined that network outsourcing presented a good business opportunity based on their pro-forma financial projections. In addition, they could utilize the forecasted savings to build their core business.


Company X Corporate and Network Profile


Company X, located in Southeast U.S., is a mid-sized manufacturing company, with approximately $550M in revenue. They decided to outsource their network in two phases starting in November of 2005. Phase I included the network infrastructure and the connectivity to their remote locations.



Voice services were to be replaced with VoIP technology in Phase II—starting approximately three months after Phase I completion. This research note focuses on Company X's Phase I experience.

Phase I Outsourcing Network Details

 


     


  • Two data centers were involved—one on the East coast and one on the West coast with OC-3 (155.5 Mbps) SONET connections.
  •  


  • 76 remote locations in the US using various combinations of DSL, ISDN, and T1 connections.
  •  


  • Remote office LANs using Fast Ethernet (100 BASE-T).
  •  


  • 85 Cisco routers and an assortment of ISDN switches, which the outsourcer agreed to purchase.
  •  


  • HP Network Node Manager in the East coast data center and a remote console in the West coast data center.
  •  


  • A network support staff of 6 personnel.
  •  


 


Planning Point


IT and C-level executives should review the problems encountered by Company X as well as the resolution actions they took. It is likely that some of these same problems could occur in other network outsourcing arrangements unless they are satisfactorily addressed in the contract. This research note discusses five of Company X's key problems, as well as the actions taken to resolve them.


Five Year Savings Looked Good: First of all, Company X did its planning homework. The financial economics indicated that after the second year of the five year contract, the Phase I outsourcing costs and associated savings would achieve a break-even point. After that, they would realize a reduction in their network expenditures for the remaining contract term.


At the end of five years, Company X projected a 20% to 24% overall savings from outsourced network services and staff elimination. In most enterprises, these savings would certainly be worth investigating. In addition, the outsourcing plan was reviewed and approved by senior management—based on the projected savings.


Next: Problems Appear Early On




 
< Previous   Next >




White Paper Library