What Makes a Great Team Member? This is so true! Our project management team, and some other people I know fit this description pe...
Outsourcing Prices May Decline by 20 Percent
Share This -
Tuesday, 24 March 2009
The cost of some outsourced IT services is expected to drop by 5 to 20 percent, according to Gartner, Inc. The reason: to the uncertain economic climate, IT budget constraints and general market consciousness.
Gartner said that this fall in prices will occur due to increasing competition in the market between traditional and new providers as more providers compete aggressively to keep revenue growth on target, while ensuring margins. Furthermore, cost-focused buying behaviors in the current economic phase will be a key factor behind the reductions for IT infrastructure outsourcing services from 2009 to 2010, with a great variability based on each single deal.
"Regardless of the relative strength of outsourcing during a recession, many clients are reporting intense discussion with their vendors and renegotiation of contracts for Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) Service Level Agreements (SLAs), fees, volumes and low-cost offshore delivery locations," said Claudio Da Rold, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. "These items are under scrutiny to identify satisfactory concessions to further reduce the cost of services on a case-by-case basis."
Mr. Da Rold added that Indian offshore providers have been coming under significant pressure for pricing reductions due to the Mumbai terrorist attack, the scandal at Satyam, rupee exchange rate fluctuations, and continued wage inflation and attrition levels.
Application hosting services will chow the sharpest declines—10% to 20%, Gartner says. It projects network services will drop 10% to 15%; data center services 5% to 15% and desktop/help desk services 5% to 10%.
Comments (1)
1. 04-02-2009 10:44
I suspect that the reason is for deployment of IBM headcount on Satayam contracts. With strong IBM backing the bleeding will slow and it will make use of their talent pool during a period when the mega deals are becoming fewer and fewer. Having an ownership share offers very little value to them (at least in terms of earning potential) and since they won't own completely they have to access to tangible resources (real estate/technology) nor the transferrance of contracts, which is normally not allowed for. One other possibility is reducing competition, but it's a heck of a way to do it when you are in a control position.
Registered
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register.