topleft
topright
Enter the Member Network Zone View the Top 10 Points Leaderboard View Members Who Are Currently Online View Latest Member Activity

Featured Members


Member Network Zone

Expert Blog Comments

IT Worker Confidence Grows
Our lives revolve around technology and this does not surprise me. Good news!
Is Your Team Working Through Lunch?
Brilliant: this should be ENFORCED in all companies struggling to be social! Great read : bookmarked...
What Makes a Great Team Member?
This is so true! Our project management team, and some other people I know fit this description pe...
How to Wield a More Intelligent Axe Print E-mail
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Wednesday, 26 May 2010

(CFOZone) By Anne Field

Companies have been slashing costs with abandon since fall of 2008--and they aren't likely to stop anytime soon. In fact, in April, 54 percent of more than 2,000 executives surveyed by McKinsey reported that they plan to reduce operating costs over the next 12 months, compared to 47 percent in February. 

Trouble is, such cost cutting seldom has much of a long-term payoff. According to McKinsey, only 10 percent of cost reduction programs show sustained results three years after companies wielded the ax. 

All that pain for almost no gain.

But, it doesn't have to be that way.  In fact, the folks at McKinsey suggest a number of steps  to make cuts stick.  There's a lot to their analysis, which you can read here . But, generally, the bottom line comes down to the following: The devil is in the details.  It's all about cost cuts done on a small, practical, in-the- trenches level.  In other words, you have to break costs out where they happen, not from a viewpoint of 30,000 feet. 

To that end, it's people at the level of, say, sales manager, not uber-Six Sigma  black belt-wearers, who should be involved in pinpointing the places to cut. These lower-level folks can analyze whether they really need to travel to see a client or can do it by videoconferencing.   But, then, you need to hold these cost cutters accountable for their decisions by, for example, including the outcome of those decisions in performance evaluations. 

Also, by looking at really detailed data you can determine what areas have a  low ROIC and which are growing, so you don't make cuts in places in which you actually might want to step up investment. 

Ultimately, says McKinsey, the goal is to create an on-going cost-management system, rather than indulging in the one-off cost-reduction efforts companies usually adopt.

None of this is rocket science. But it's certainly worth considering. Why go through the sturm and drang and just plain unpleasantness of cost cutting if you can't make the benefits last?




Comment on this article
RSS comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

 
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
< Previous   Next >




News & Noteworthy Archive

Past News Items From Reuters

White Paper Library

Copyright © 2007-2012 CIOZones. All Rights Reserved. CIOZone is a property of PSN, Inc.