topleft
topright
Enter the Member Network Zone View the Top 10 Points Leaderboard View Members Who Are Currently Online View Latest Member Activity

Featured Members


Member Network Zone

Expert Blog Comments

IT Worker Confidence Grows
Our lives revolve around technology and this does not surprise me. Good news!
Is Your Team Working Through Lunch?
Brilliant: this should be ENFORCED in all companies struggling to be social! Great read : bookmarked...
What Makes a Great Team Member?
This is so true! Our project management team, and some other people I know fit this description pe...
Dismantling Conventional IT Wisdom Print E-mail
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Monday, 09 March 2009
Article Index
Dismantling Conventional IT Wisdom
Focusing on the Right Customer

The next assertion Lewis tackles is the notion that employees, departments, divisions and business units of a company are IT's internal customers. Everything about this is wrong, he asserts, starting with the definition of customers as anyone who uses your products and services. These people are consumers and not customers, he says. "IT needs to focus on exactly the same customer as everyone else in the enterprise: The real, paying, external customers," he adds.


Part of the problem with the internal customer model is it reduces IT's job to responding to internal requests. The business figures out what technology meets its needs and IT delivers it. That doesn't allow IT to take a leadership role when it comes to identifying new technologies that can solve business problems. IT departments need to be more than suppliers of technology to internal customers if they want to help the business make its products and services more attractive to its external customers. "In healthy companies," Lewis notes, "IT's role is to make the enterprise and those who do the work of the enterprise more effective."


Lewis goes so far as to recommend banishing the phrase "internal customer" from your vocabulary. "If you need to describe your relationship to someone outside of IT, tell them you're in this together, and ask what you need to do together to help their part of the company operate better…Memorize this phrase: 'Our job is to help you succeed.' "


Running IT as a business comes under fire from Lewis for many reasons, starting with the vagueness of what people mean by "business". He illustrates this by listing 11 different definitions of a business, which doesn't begin to tackle all the possibilities there are. Which of these, he asks rhetorically, make no sense for internal IT? Which make just as much sense for internal IT as a department as for internal IT as a business? Which fits only the idea of running internal IT as a business? Not one of the definitions fit the latter, he notes. "There isn't any definition of business, that is, that's useful as a guide for how to run IT differently than you would run it as part of the overall enterprise," he says.


What people really mean when they tell you to run IT as a business, he says, is establish service-level agreements (SLAs) and charge back all costs. These, Lewis says, do not make sense for internal IT. Negotiating SLAs with business managers puts IT and business on opposite sides of the table. That's a no-no for Lewis who is a firm believer in establishing strong relationships between business and IT people. Instead of a contract, Lewis prefers that business managers and IT come to a shared understanding about what is needed for success. This can be documented to be sure there is agreement, but does not need to be in contract form to be dragged out if problems arise. As for charge backs, Lewis's preferred model is to inform those who request IT services what they will cost. This of course works best in companies where each executive "is a leader of the whole company." If everyone wants the company to succeed and not just their turf, this solution is simple and effective.


And if everyone is pulling in the same direction there is no need for "IT projects"—you have business projects. What everyone should be focused on is changing how business operates. And IT's role is to ask: How do you want your operation to run differently and better? IT should not be asking what business users want the software to do. Even IT infrastructure projects are not, strictly speaking, IT projects. "They are still business projects first," says Lewis, and deliver business benefits by reducing costs and managing risk.


Ultimately, IT gets into trouble when the CEO asks: How do we know we're getting our money's worth out of our IT investments? Lewis says this question is fundamentally flawed because there are no IT projects. He says, "IT doesn't deliver value. It enables it." Non-discretionary IT spending is for the ongoing cost of past projects and discretionary spending must be justified by the business through project governance.


No one said running IT is easy, but if Lewis is right, some of the rationale behind IT management is far more complicated than it needs to be.


Also of interest:
Book:
Straight to the Top: Becoming a World-Class CIO, by Gregory S. Smith, published by Wiley, April 2006. A CIO's guide to the top job.

Book:
CIO Wisdom: Best Practices from Silicon Valley, by Dean Lane, with members of the CIO Community of Practice, published by Prentice Hall PTR, August 2003. What it takes to be a great CIO.



CIOZ Question: What's the worst IT management advice you ever got?




Comments (1)
RSS comments
1. 03-09-2009 12:09
 
Enjoyed the view of users as consumers of IT and not customers and in ways understand this and like this approach. I have used the phrase SLU instead of SLA. The difference is "service level understanding" not agreement, in words "do you understand that at the level of funding IT is given this is the expected service to expect." Versus asking them to agree which they seldom do.  
I also agree that I have trouble with the word "alignment", if you are working with the C in your title you are helping set strategy so when you come back to run your IT group you are aligned. If you are waiting for strategy to be set, you working more as an IT Director and responding to the company versus helping and guide and influence.
Registered
 
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.



 
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
< Previous   Next >




News & Noteworthy Archive

Past News Items From Reuters

White Paper Library

Copyright © 2007-2012 CIOZones. All Rights Reserved. CIOZone is a property of PSN, Inc.