topleft
topright
Enter the Member Network Zone View the Top 10 Points Leaderboard View Members Who Are Currently Online View Latest Member Activity

Featured Members


Member Network Zone

Expert Blog Comments

IT Worker Confidence Grows
Our lives revolve around technology and this does not surprise me. Good news!
Is Your Team Working Through Lunch?
Brilliant: this should be ENFORCED in all companies struggling to be social! Great read : bookmarked...
What Makes a Great Team Member?
This is so true! Our project management team, and some other people I know fit this description pe...
Patent decisions pending Print E-mail
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb

Today’s Times piece on the Supremos’ decision to review a lower court ruling that narrowed the scope of business process patents is less than elucidating. Yes, the article points out that the move is “troubling” to software developers but doesn’t really explain why.

 

And when you think about it, it could be troubling or reassuring, depending on whether one holds such patents or not. And just as many companies, if not more, are likely not to hold such patents as to do so, and so would welcome the narrowing of intellectual property rights here.

 

After all, software is at heart just a bunch of algorithms, and math can’t be patented. So where do developers get off claiming they’ve a right to monopolize something that’s known in the trade as “obvious” or based on “a priori art?” The thing is, one person’s IP is another’s restraint of trade.

 

Of course, those in the latter camp may worry that the higher court may reverse the lower court decision rather than let the decision stand, but the article doesn’t make that clear. As it’s written, it sounds as if more fear that the SCOTUS will uphold the decision. But who really knows.

 

All of this makes me think this is a great subject for a forum. So go on over there and weigh in.

 

On a related note, I see that SecTreas Geithner has said absolutely nothing while in China, not at least judging from the big speech he was scheduled to deliver yesterday, about that country's stance toward IP, which is a big bugaboo for U.S. companies.

 

Perhaps he’s been reassured by recent court decisions in China involving the German company Neoplan Bus and Japan’s Samsung, which favored holders of patents and imposed substantial penalties on those found to infringe them.

 

As a result of the decisions, as one patent lawyer I spoke with recently, Ed Weisz of Cohen Pontani Liberman & Pavane in New York City, put it, “Foreign companies should feel better about the value of their patents.”

 

I’ve an email into U.S. Trade Rep Ron Kirk to see if he’s going to mention any of this in his own speech today before a meeting of a U.S.-China business council, and will update this to let you know what if anything I hear back.

 




Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 06-02-2009 14:04
 
Ron, 
 
Given the economic state we are in globally, do you think SecTreas wants to be controversial on his first trip to China? 
 
I can only imagine the fury it would create in US-China relations if there was a perception of negativity coming out of our camp while on a greet-meet session there.
Registered
 
Jay Rajani
2. 06-02-2009 16:45
 
I'm picturing a March Madness-style grid of who in the industry would want business patents upheld and who would benefit if it's overturned. And the winner is...
Registered
 
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

 
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
< Previous   Next >




White Paper Library

Copyright © 2007-2012 CIOZones. All Rights Reserved. CIOZone is a property of PSN, Inc.