topleft
topright
Enter the Member Network Zone View the Top 10 Points Leaderboard View Members Who Are Currently Online View Latest Member Activity

Featured Members


Member Network Zone

Expert Blog Comments

IT Worker Confidence Grows
Our lives revolve around technology and this does not surprise me. Good news!
Is Your Team Working Through Lunch?
Brilliant: this should be ENFORCED in all companies struggling to be social! Great read : bookmarked...
What Makes a Great Team Member?
This is so true! Our project management team, and some other people I know fit this description pe...
Finding the Right Job Candidate Print E-mail
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb

There’s an interesting article on ITWeb about different techniques that HR professionals can use to identify the right candidates for an open position and to retain them. The article notes the potential for utilizing a third-party predictive index service to help match an individual’s talents and behaviors with a job specification.

Though they can vary slightly from one service to another, a predictive index often includes a questionnaire that the job candidate fills out. As the ITWeb article points out, a predictive index provides three pictures of a candidate to help identify who the person is, how they perceive themselves and what their “displayed behavior” outside of their interview persona.

As the story also states, picking the wrong candidate can be costly and the use of a PI system to can help employers to find the right fit. It’s great for employers to have these types of tools available to them to help with the employee selection process. But I’d caution CIOs and IT hiring managers not to over-rely on such tools or to discount other important components of the interviewing process.

Several IT leaders I’ve spoken to about this topic offer similar descriptions of how the interviewing process works at their organizations. Let’s say an IT organization is looking to hire a .Net developer who’s got a few years experience in their particular industry and they receive responses from 100 applicants.

Typically what happens is the hiring manager is able to narrow the field to fewer than ten candidates because a) they’re able to quickly determine that most of the candidates lack the kind of experience they’re really looking for and b) quite frankly some of the applicants aren’t really .Net developers at all, at least not in any real sense of the word. More often than not, they're IT professionals with tangential or limited .Net experience.

Then, during the face-to-face interviews, IT leaders get a deeper sense of each candidate, what their accomplishments are and whether their technical skills match with what they’re looking for. More importantly, they sense from the candidate’s responses and demeanor whether they’ve got the right personality fit for their organization. If a job candidate makes it through that round, they’ll likely have to endure another set of interviews, including a meeting with the CIO for the final litmus test.

It may not be a perfect approach but it’s a process that a lot of IT managers continue to rely on. And it often comes down to a gut feeling and common sense. Still, there’s no harm in trying to apply a more scientific method to help pick the right employee.

 

 

 




Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 03-13-2010 21:35
 
I am a person who believes that the majority of hiring managers don't have a clue as to how to pick out technical talent and should either be retrained or fired. Over the course of a number of years at different companies the only real good candidates I saw through recruiters were the ones that came from engineering/HR partnerships. In my experience through this is more the exception than the rule. 
 
-sean
Registered
 
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
2. 03-15-2010 17:52
 
A predictive index can be an effective tool, but it must be only part of the process. It can\'t replace the face to face interview, but can be used to improve the process as a whole. I have seen companies mis-use this tool however. Choosing the right tool and getting a baseline for what success means in that specific environment is critical.  
 
I worked for a Fortune 200 company that picked a tool only because a VP had used it at another company and it worked for them. My former employer jumped right in the deep end, with eyes wide shut, and went for the same results as was used for that other company, a direct competitor but very different culture. After some pushing we were able to convince the team that we needed to have our top performers take the test to get a baseline for what we needed. The results showed us that we would not have hired any of our top performers if this index was a deal/no deal pass fail part of the hiring process.  
 
Regarding the previous comment, training hiring managers on how to interview is also critical part of any process. It is not an intuitive process that just because one is a manager makes them an expert at interviewing. Far from it... 
 
- Ann
Registered
 
Ann Spoor

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

 
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
< Previous   Next >




News & Noteworthy Archive

Past News Items From Reuters

White Paper Library

Copyright © 2007-2012 CIOZones. All Rights Reserved. CIOZone is a property of PSN, Inc.