What Makes a Great Team Member? This is so true! Our project management team, and some other people I know fit this description pe...
Don't VCs like Facebook?
Share This -
It’s nice for Facebook that it just managed to raise another
$200 million. But what does it say that the investor in question paid a third
less for its stake than Microsoft did for its piece of the social networking
company two years ago? Or that Facebook had to venture as far as Moscow
to draw up sufficient interest for this go-around?
Yes, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerburg claims the company was
approached by many other firms. But none evidently was willing to pony up as
much as Digital Sky.
That suggests to me that the recent hoopla over all the potential
new deal-making in tech land and elsewhere remains just that. Consider along these lines the speculation that Broadcom’s hostile bid of $9.25 per share for Emulex is just the opening round in a bidding war, largely because of the appeal of the latter’s Fiber Channel
over Ethernet technology.
Our own research finds that demand for FCoE may be a long
way from materializing. And while the question we asked was admittedly phrased
in loaded fashion, the quarterly results that H-P reported last week were
nothing to write home about, either, and according to this analysis reflect the dismal
state of current spending on technology. And as goes investment, so go deals, at least in the long run.
I don’t mean to throw too much cold water on the optimism we
keep hearing about the imminent end of the Great Recession. But a healthy dose
of skepticism about such happy talk is warranted, if only to put the economy on a firmer footing
going forward. To do otherwise is to indulge in wishful thinking and ultimately to try to inflate
yet another asset bubble, and we’ve had at least one too many of those
recently.
Comments (2)
1. 05-26-2009 16:26
Facebook's conference call with reporters today didn't offer up many answers about its state of affairs.
Of course, giving sparse details about your financial situation is one of the primary advantages of being a private company. You get to tout your successes and remain silent whenever tough questions come up. Or any questions for that matter.
Facebook, arguably the most high-profile private company in the world right now, is definitely taking advantage of that situation.
The obvious question is, “What do you need the money for?” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company had no specific plans for the money and that it’s nice to have a cash cushion for “flexibility.” Enlightening. (Makes me wonder why they bothered with a call in the first place, if that’s the case. The new investor, Digital Sky Technologies (DST), won’t be getting a board seat or anything. Maybe the 25-year-old Zuckerberg just wanted an opportunity to keep polishing his media skills. Other tidbits include Facebook expecting ad revenue to be up 70% this year and to be cash-flow positive sometime in 2010.)
Also, like you mentioned, what does this investment say about the deal Microsoft struck with Facebook in October 2007, when Microsoft bought a 1.6% stake for $240 million, which valued Facebook at $15 billion? On the conference call, Zuckerberg said the Microsoft investment came at the peak of market and the deal was about ads and search. The current valuation is “fair,” he said. Bummer for Microsoft.
But even the terms of the new investment aren’t that clear. DST is getting preferred shares, not common equity. The Russian firm is also “planning to offer to purchase at least $100 million of Facebook common stock from existing common stockholders that would facilitate liquidity for current and former employees’ vested shares in the company,” according to a press release. That means DST will be getting a bigger share of the company than initially advertised.
This deal also means Facebook won’t be going public all that soon. Zuckerberg said an IPO is in the cards, but the company is in no rush.
I guess we’re going to have to keep waiting for some real answers about Facebook.
Registered
2. 05-26-2009 17:24
I saw that about the agreement to buy common. But that only raises more questions, as in at what price? I also saw that explanation of the rationale for Mister Softee's interest, and didn't quite follow it. He's evidently saying that Microsoft got other benefits out of its investment, but what those are exactly seems rather sketchy at best. Oh well, guess we'll have to wait until Facebook goes public before the picture becomes much clearer.
Registered
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register.