topleft
topright
Enter the Member Network Zone View the Top 10 Points Leaderboard View Members Who Are Currently Online View Latest Member Activity

Featured Members


Member Network Zone

Expert Blog Comments

IT Worker Confidence Grows
Our lives revolve around technology and this does not surprise me. Good news!
Is Your Team Working Through Lunch?
Brilliant: this should be ENFORCED in all companies struggling to be social! Great read : bookmarked...
What Makes a Great Team Member?
This is so true! Our project management team, and some other people I know fit this description pe...
Federal Cloud Security Proposal Unveiled Print E-mail
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb

By Mark Henricks

 

Eighteen months in the making, the federal government’s proposed standard for cloud computing security has been unveiled and is now receiving comments. The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) as proposed builds on existing guidelines for government IT systems from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Commenters have until Dec. 2 to submit comments.

 

FedRAMP is intended to let federal agencies use cloud services that have been vetted according to a government-wide security standard. Many federal agencies are interested in implementing cloud-based solutions, but are hesitant because of unresolved security issues. As the proposed standard notes at one point, “The decision to embrace cloud computing technology is a risk-based decision, not a technology-based decision.” It’s anticipated that having a set of pre-approved, government-wide security benchmarks will speed certification and accreditation of cloud computing products and services.

The new standard addresses three cloud service models, including Software as a Service (Saas), Platform as a Service (Paas), and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). The baseline benchmarks specify processes and procedures for security matters ranging from access control policies and remote access to security training and audits. The source for most of these standards is the NIST’s Special Publication 800-53R3.

 

The General Services Administration and CIO Council have been working with NIST, state and local governments, academics and non-governmental organizations for the last 18 months to produce the widely anticipated drafts. The announcement by Kundra’s office indicated that the first phase of the new security standards will be implemented in the first quarter of 2011.

Until Dec. 2, comments will be accepted online from government sources, private organizations and the public at large. Comments can be submitted through links found at the FedRAMP website. The same site also contains downloadable documents pertaining to the proposed standard.

 

In addition to providing information about the draft standard online, the General Services Administration will hold a pair of information sessions during the comment period. One will be for government agencies. The other is for vendors. Both will take place in Washington, D.C.

 

Vendors have been as interested in the standards as federal agency IT professionals, because lack of broad-based security standards have held up what are expected to be sizable volumes of government purchases of cloud products and services. Adhering to the security benchmarks will be voluntary, but vendors will likely sign on to them in large numbers in order to tap the federal procurement markets.

 

However, the announcement for the new standards informed commercial vendors that they cannot directly request FedRAMP authorization for their offerings. Requests for FedRAMP’s stamp of approval must initiate with a federal agency that is using or planning to use a cloud product or service. The statement to vendors noted that it may not be possible to initially accommodate all requests for FedRAMP certification. In that case, the priority will go to systems that will have a large user base or that will be used by multiple Federal agencies.

 




Comments (1)
RSS comments
1. 12-04-2010 20:05
 
These seems like a good step in trying to make the information resources used by the federal government more efficient. However, I do worry about the true security implications of this. Hopefully, the vetting process that must be run on the prospective vendors will be very thorough and able to keep the informaiton truly secure. 
 
-sean
Registered
 
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

 
Share This -
Digg
Delicious
Slashdot
Furl it!
Reddit
Spurl
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
< Previous   Next >




White Paper Library

Copyright © 2007-2012 CIOZones. All Rights Reserved. CIOZone is a property of PSN, Inc.